Friend Sunil asks “Why are you limiting your blog to smallish commentaries on what others are thinking or writing? Looking forward to forms and structures of how you create your critique.”
There are two different things in his question which need to be understood properly. Sunil, it is not as simple as you may see it the “smallish commentaries on what others are thinking or writing?” if one wanted to understand the process of social science as an entity in a economy must try to understand two things one is how these “smallish commentaries” arises and at what situation. Most importantly, how it got formed his or her “thinking or writing?” what were their pushback’s to believe in some time and rubbish in another time but both are in his or her life time.
Secondly “to forms and structures of how you create your critique” is an important exercise of a persons mind as well as its relationship with the writers or thinkers mind. You can not simply ignore one and look for other one. It is something like this if the child wanted to make sense of any word or letter (mostly merely ‘told’) have to be sure that at what extant that child has thought through and in at what way.
So don’t ignore or underestimate any sort of opinions unless you are sure that he or she is making deliberately wrong and stupidly.
If you ignore today, tomorrow its role will be as like the present Indian communists who are terribly ruined people’s mind and still continues.
Who are responsible for that? It is the question of the leadership that has taken place in the fifties and later period
In this process the ruled socialists created a situation where people believed that there is no alternative for issues like poverty, hunger, unemployment, The State Education etc.
Now you look back and honestly think that who was responsible for “creating the great Indian socialist darkness”.
No more research is needs to answer the above question than the past fifteen or eighteen year period.